Volume 19, Issue 2 (Summer & Autumn 2022)                   ASJ 2022, 19(2): 119-124 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Monsef F, Sadeghinezhad J, Bayat A, Bojarzadeh H. Histochemical Study of Intestinal Mucins in Adult Male New Zealand Rabbit. ASJ 2022; 19 (2) :119-124
URL: http://anatomyjournal.ir/article-1-595-en.html
1- Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Full-Text [PDF 617 kb]   (60 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (192 Views)
Full-Text:   (30 Views)
1. Introduction
The small intestine is a part of the digestive system located between the stomach and the large intestine, where most food digestion and absorption occur [1]. The small intestine has three sections: The duodenum, jejunum, and ileum. Histologically, the small intestine consists of a mucosal, submucosal, muscular, and serosal layer [2]. Histochemistry is a combination of biochemical and histological techniques used to study the structure and chemical properties of cells and tissues [3]. Mucins are high molecular weight and highly glycosylated (glycoconjugated) proteins produced by epithelial tissues of most animal species. Mucins perform functions such as lubrication, cell signaling, and chemical barrier formation [4]. Mucin is one of the major glycoproteins that make up mucus. This molecule, composed partly of various sugars and partly of proteins, is composed of repeating units containing proline, threonine, and serine [5]. Mucin is secreted by goblet cells, leukocytes, and cells of the digestive tract and plays a role in regulating ion transport and, in other cases, a role as a receptor [6].
Goblet cells are found in the cells of epithelial tissue that play a role in mucin secretion [7]. Goblet cells are found on the surface of both villi and crypts [8]. They have a nucleus at the base and cytoplasm at the tip, which is filled with mucus and acts like a unicellular gland [9]. The mucus secreted by these cells is an acidic glycoprotein that makes the surface of the cells slippery and has a protective function [10].
Goblet cells mainly use a merocrine secretion method and secrete mucinogen granules into the lumen, but they can also use apocrine methods [11].
Brunner’s glands (duodenal glands) are tubular submucosal glands found in the duodenum [12]. The main function of these glands is to produce an alkaline secretion rich in mucus (bicarbonate-containing mucus) to protect the duodenum from the acidic contents entering the duodenum from the stomach, and also to provide alkaline conditions for the activity of intestinal enzymes [13].
The morphology of the intestine among different species reflects dietary habits, absorption, and digestive function and, therefore, varies from species to species [14]. Mucus and mucin play an important role in the small intestine to prevent contact and invasion of bacteria and pathogens [15]. The mucus barrier is one of the most important factors in protecting the gastrointestinal tract, so its role has been studied for decades. However, the mechanism of intestinal protection still needs to be better understood [6].
Therefore, histochemical studies of the small intestinal mucin have been performed in various animal species, such as humans [16], pigs [17], rats [18], mice [19], and Persian squirrels [20]. Detailed histochemical studies of goblet cells and Brunner’s gland mucus have not been thoroughly performed in small intestines of rabbits, but there are studies for identifying acidic and neutral mucin in some parts of the intestine, such as the duodenum [21].
The rabbits are an important laboratory species for various experimental research in the field of digestive systems [22]. On the other hand, this species is also important from a veterinary point of view because various diseases such as intestinal obstruction, intestinal ulcers, dysautonomia, bacterial and viral infections, parasites, and toxins can affect the intestine [23].
Accurate knowledge of the tissue and chemical structure of the intestine is important to identify pathogens and apply appropriate treatment methods. Therefore, in this study, the histochemical profile of rabbit small intestinal mucus is investigated using the periodic acid-schiff (PAS) and Alcian blue (AB) techniques (pH 1.0 and 2.5), as well as PAS-AB (pH 2.5) and aldehyde-fuchsin- AB (pH 2.5).

2. Methods
Five adult male New Zealand rabbits were used for this study. The animals were purchased from the Pasteur Institute of Iran. They were fed by standard food and water ad libitum. The animals were euthanized with chloroform. The abdominal cavity was dissected, the small intestine was separated, and its various parts, including the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum, were removed. Each part of the intestine along the antimesenteric border was cut, opened, fixed on balsa wood, and immersed in a 4% buffer formalin solution. Then, according to the method of systematic random selection, 8-10 pieces for each part (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum) were selected and immersed in 4% buffer formalin for further fixation. After routine tissue processing, the specimens were embedded in paraffin, and tissue sections with a thickness of 5 µm were prepared using the microtome.
Mucin secreted by goblet cells and Brunner’s glands in the small intestine of rabbits was analyzed by a series of histochemical tests. Periodic acid-schiff (PAS) was used to detect neutral mucin [21]. Sulfate and carboxylic acid mucins were detected with the stain AB (pH 1 and 2.5) [24]. In addition, the combination of PAS and AB (pH 2.5) was used to detect acidic and neutral mucin [25]. Furthermore, AF-AB (pH 2.5) was performed to detect the type of sulfated or carboxylated mucin [26].

3. Results
The characteristics of the mucins secreted by the mucosal secretions of rabbit small intestine are summarized in Table 1.



Goblet cells reacted positively with PAS and showed a red color due to the presence of neutral mucins (Figure 1a), and the highest intensity of the reaction was observed in the duodenum (Table 1), while no positive reaction was observed in Brunner’s glands (Figure 2a).



The secretory units of goblet cells and Brunner’s glands showed a positive reaction with AB at pH 1 and 2.5, representing sulfated mucin and carboxylic acid mucin, respectively (Figure 1b, 1c and Figure 2b, c). The highest intensity of goblet cell reaction with AB (pH 1) was observed in the ileum and with AB (pH 2.5) in the jejunum (Table 1).
PAS-AB (pH 2.5) to compare the content of acidic and neutral mucin showed that many goblet cells in the small intestine were stained reddish purple, indicating mixed-type mucin secretion, in which the content of neutral mucin is higher than that of acidic mucin, and that a small number of cells were bluish-purple in colour, indicating mixed-type mucin in which the content of acidic mucin is higher than that of neutral (Figure 1d). The jejunum showed a stronger response to PAS-AB (pH 2.5) than other parts of the small intestine (Table 1), although the secretory units of Brunner’s glands were seen only in blue colour and contained acidic mucin (Figure 2d).
The study of the reaction of the secretory units of the small intestine with AF-AB (pH 2.5), performed to compare the content of carboxylic acid and sulfated mucin, showed that in the goblet cells, the content of sulfated mucin (purple colour) was higher than the content of carboxylmucin (blue colour) (Figure 1e). Different parts of the small intestine showed the same reaction with AF-AB (pH 2.5) (Table 1). In the secretory units of Brunner’s glands, the content of carboxylated mucin was higher than that of sulfated mucin (Figure 2e).



4. Discussion
The general characteristics of the histochemical profile of rabbit small intestinal mucus in this study are consistent with those described for other mammals, with some differences.
Mucin secretion from rabbit small intestinal goblet cells contained neutral mucin and carboxylic and sulphatic acid mucins. The results obtained in this study were similar to histochemical studies performed in 13 mammalian species, including rats, voles, guinea pigs, and rabbits [21]. Moreover, similar results were observed in the goblet cells of the small intestine of Persian squirrel [20] and the duodenum of mice [27]. These observations suggest that the mucins secreted by goblet cells have been conserved with respect to their charge during mammalian evolution [28].
This study showed that Brunner’s glands are composed of mucous and serous cells. Brunner’s glands in horses consist of mucous and serous cells [29]. In Persian squirrel [20], moose, elk, bison, and white-tailed deer [30], they consist of mucous cells only. Brunner’s glands are located in the rabbit’s small intestine at the beginning of the duodenum, consistent with most other mammals [31]. Interestingly, in horses, these glands are located in the jejunum region [32]. 
This study showed that Brunner’s glands secrete carboxylic acid mucin and sulfate acid mucin in rabbits. In bison, deer, and guinea pigs, these glands also contain sulfated and carboxylic acid mucins [33]. Brunner’s glands produce acidic and neutral mucin in mice [27] and Persian squirrels [20]. In humans, rhesus and Japanese macaques, cats, raccoons, rats, and opossums, Brunner’s glands contain neutral mucin [21].
In cattle, the Brunner’ glands of the small intestine contain neutral and acidic mucins that appear as lobules, indicating specific digestive processes in ruminants [34]. In horses, the Brunner’s glands secrete acidic mucin. The acidic mucin secreted in the equine small intestine may play an important role in cellulose metabolism or in the digestion of bacterial microflora from the stomach of herbivores [35]. The results show that the Brunner’ glands of 27 bat species that fed differently produced only neutral mucins [36]. It was also found that the histochemical profiles of the different species could not be assigned to one order or another [21]. The protective role of these glands has been demonstrated in several studies [21, 24], and perhaps the location of Brunner’s glands in the initial region of the duodenum in rabbits suggests the presence of a damaging factor to the epithelium in this region. 

5. Conclusion 
Considering that the rabbit is important as a laboratory animal for various studies on the gastrointestinal tract and is also kept as a domestic animal, the mucin secreted by the goblet cells and Brunner’s glands in different parts of the small intestine of this species was studied. The results showed that the goblet cells of the small intestine secrete neutral and acidic mucin, while the Brunner’s glands are involved in acidic secretion.

Ethical Considerations

Compliance with ethical guidelines

There were no ethical considerations to be considered in this research.

Funding
This research did not receive any grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.

Authors' contributions
All authors equally contributed to preparing this article.

Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.





References
  1. Svihus B. Function of the digestive system. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2014; 23(2):306-14. [DOI:10.3382/japr.2014-00937]
  2. Treuting PM, Arends MJ, Dintzis SM. Upper gastrointestinal tract. In: Treuting PM, Dintzis SM, Montine KS, editors.Comparative anatomy and histology. Massachusetts:Academic Press; 2018. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-802900-8.00011-7]
  3. Rost F. Histochemical localization and assay of enzymes. Journal of Clinical Pathology Supplement (Ass Clin Path). 1970; 4:43. [DOI:10.1136/jcp.s1-4.1.43] [PMID]
  4. Marin F, Luquet G, Marie B, Medakovic D. Molluscan shell proteins: Primary structure, origin, and evolution. Current Topics in Developmental Biology. 2008; 80:209-76. [DOI:10.1016/S0070-2153(07)80006-8] [PMID]
  5. Fowler JE, Kleinteich T, Franz J, Jaye C, Fischer DA, Gorb SN, et al. Surface chemistry of the frog sticky-tongue mechanism. Biointerphases. 2018; 13(6):06E408. [DOI:10.1116/1.5052651] [PMID]
  6. Pelaseyed T, Bergström JH, Gustafsson JK, Ermund A, Birchenough GM, Schütte A, et al. The mucus and mucins of the goblet cells and enterocytes provide the first defense line of the gastrointestinal tract and interact with the immune system. Immunological Reviews. 2014; 260(1):8-20. [DOI:10.1111/imr.12182] [PMID
  7. Battelle BA, Dartt DA, Beebe D, Bok D, Tamm ER, Edelhauser H, et al. Encyclopedia of the eye. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 2010. [Link]
  8. Jung K, Saif LJ. Goblet cell depletion in small intestinal villous and crypt epithelium of conventional nursing and weaned pigs infected with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Research in Veterinary Science. 2017; 110:12-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.10.009] [PMID]
  9. Abdalla AS, Khan KA, Shah A, Asaad A, Salter V, Barron M, et al. Colonic goblet cell carcinoid: Rarity of a rarity! A case report and review of the literature. Chirurgia. 2020; 115(1):102-11. [DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.115.1.102] [PMID]
  10. McGuckin MA, Hasnain SZ. Goblet cells as mucosal sentinels for immunity. Mucosal Immunology. 2017; 10(5):1118-21. [DOI:10.1038/mi.2016.132] [PMID]
  11. Rogers D. Airway goblet cells: Responsive and adaptable front-line defenders. European Respiratory Journal. 1994; 7(9):1690-706. [DOI:10.1183/09031936.94.07091690] [PMID]
  12. Babich JP, Klein J, Friedel DM. Endoscopic removal of a brunneroma with EUS guidance. Southern Medical Journal. 2010; 103(3):250-2. [DOI:10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181c95727] [PMID]
  13. Abbass R, Al-Kawas FH. Brunner gland hamartoma. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2008; 4(7):473-5. [PMID]
  14. Kigata T, Ikegami R, Shibata H. Macroscopic anatomical study of the distribution of the cranial mesenteric artery to the intestine in the rabbit. Anatomical Science International. 2018; ;93(2):291-8. [DOI:10.1007/s12565-017-0411-0] [PMID]
  15. Paone P, Cani PD. Mucus barrier, mucins and gut microbiota: The expected slimy partners? Gut. 2020; 69(12):2232-43. [DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322260] [PMID
  16. Lindén SK, Florin TH, McGuckin MA. Mucin dynamics in intestinal bacterial infection. PloS One. 2008; 3(12):e3952. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0003952] [PMID
  17. Rieger J, Drewes B, Hünigen H, Plendl J. Mucosubstances in the porcine gastrointestinal tract: Fixation, staining and quantification. European Journal of Histochemistry: EJH. 2019; 63(2):3030. [DOI:10.4081/ejh.2019.3030] [PMID]   
  18. Gomes JR, Ayub LC, Dos Reis CA, Machado MJ, da Silva J, Omar NF, et al. Goblet cells and intestinal Alkaline phosphatase expression (IAP) during the development of the rat small intestine. Acta Histochemica. 2017; 119(1):71-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.acthis.2016.11.010] [PMID]
  19. Ding Y, Wang K, Xu C, Hao M, Li H, Ding L. Intestinal Claudin-7 deficiency impacts the intestinal microbiota in mice with colitis. BMC Gastroenterology. 2022; 22(1):24. [DOI:10.1186/s12876-022-02100-8] [PMID]   
  20. Tootian Z, Sadeghinezhad J, Sheibani MT, Fazelipour S, De Sordi N, Chiocchetti R. Histological and mucin histochemical study of the small intestine of the Persian squirrel (Sciurus anomalus). Anatomical Science International. 2013; 88(1):38-45. [DOI:10.1007/s12565-012-0159-5] [PMID]
  21. Schumacher U, Duku M, Katoh M, Jörns J, Krause WJ. Histochemical similarities of mucins produced by Brunner’s glands and pyloric glands: A comparative study. The Anatomical Record Part A: Discoveries in Molecular, Cellular, and Evolutionary Biology: An Official Publication of the American Association of Anatomists. 2004; 278(2):540-50. [DOI:10.1002/ar.a.20046] [PMID]
  22. Kralovic M, Vjaclovsky M, Tonar Z, Grajciarova M, Lorenzova J, Otahal M, et al. Nanofiber fractionalization stimulates healing of large intestine anastomoses in rabbits. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2022; 17:6335-45.[DOI:10.2147/IJN.S364888] [PMID]   
  23. DeCubellis J, Graham J. Gastrointestinal disease in guinea pigs and rabbits.  The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Exotic Animal Practice. 2013; 16(2):421-35. [DOI:10.1016/j.cvex.2013.01.002] [PMID]   
  24. Bancroft J, Cook H. Manual of histological techniques and their diagnostic application. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. [Link]
  25. Mowry R. Observations on the use of sulphuric ether for the sulphation of hydroxyl groups in tissue sections. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry. 1956; 4:407. [Link]
  26. Spicer S, Meyer D. Histochemical differentiation of acid mucopolysaccharides by means of combined aldehyde fuchsin-alcian blue staining. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1960; 33(5_ts):453-60. [DOI:10.1093/ajcp/33.5_ts.453]
  27. Obuoforibo A. Mucosubstances in Brunner’s glands of the mouse. Journal of Anatomy. 1975; 119(Pt 2):287-94. [PMID]
  28. Ota H, Nakayama J, Momose M, Kurihara M, Ishihara K, Hotta K, et al. New monoclonal antibodies against gastric gland mucous cell-type mucins: A comparative immunohistochemical study. Histochemistry and Cell Biology. 1998; 110(2):113-9. [DOI:10.1007/s004180050272] [PMID]
  29. Takehana K, Abe M, Iwasa K, Hiraga T. Histochemistry of complex carbohydrates in the horse duodenal gland. The Japanese journal of Veterinary Science. 1989; 51(5):909-15. [DOI:10.1292/jvms1939.51.909] [PMID]
  30. Krause W. Morphological and histochemical observations on the duodenal glands of eight wild ungulate species native to North America. American Journal of Anatomy. 1981; 162(2):167-81. [DOI:10.1002/aja.1001620208] [PMID]
  31. Krause WJ. Brunner’s glands: A structural, histochemical and pathological profile. Progress in Histochemistry and Cytochemistry. 2000; 35(4):255-367. [DOI:10.1016/S0079-6336(00)80006-6]
  32. Coers Eurell JO, Dellman HD. Textbook of veterinary histology. Hoboken: Wiley; 2006. [Link]
  33. Poddar S, Jacob S. Mucosubstance histochemistry of Brunner’s glands, pyloric glands and duodenal goblet cells in the ferret. Histochemistry. 1979; 65(1):67-81. [DOI:10.1007/BF00496687] [PMID]
  34. Takehana K, Abe M, Iwasa K, Hiraga T, Miyata H. Carbohydrate histochemistry of bovine duodenal glands. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 53(4):699–706. [DOI:10.1292/jvms.53.699] [PMID]
  35. Oduor-Okelo D. Histochemistry of the duodenal glands of the cat and horse. Acta Anat (Basel). 1976; 94(3):449-56. [DOI:10.1159/000144575] [PMID]
  36. Forman GL. Histochemical differences in gastric mucus of bats. Journal of Mammalogy. 52(1):191–3. [DOI:10.2307/1378443] [PMID]
Type of Study: Original | Subject: Histology
Received: 2022/02/10 | Accepted: 2022/05/23 | Published: 2022/07/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb